perps upping threats

Now the freaks are upping the threats by stating them in ingenious ways to control me since I decided to flout a little of their control yesterday and today.  I didn’t listen to the endless barrage of threats to do this and do that all day pretty much.  I just kept saying “mind control” and ignoring them.

Should I cave in?   It’s always “easier” to listen to the threats and not to do the behavior they “warn” about except for the fact it gives them even more control.  Ugly shits.  They have no control over their lives so must control mine.  I think they want some kind of ultimatum due to how they stated the threat.  The V2k pigs say this is “serious” this time.  Only time will tell.

As far as David Foster Wallace is concerned, I’m getting “perped” on him, now.  A store clerk who seemed perpish was wearing one of his trademark white kerchiefs and today I saw another white kerchief on the ground immediately followed by an SUV with sneering perp boys in it.  I guess he was a ti after all, and not just depressed.  Guess they want to scare me off of reading his books, too.

it happened again.

Again the perps proved they not only know everything about my life, but seem to know the future as well…I won’t say how they proved it this time, but it’s not the first time they have proven it.  Is there a way thru telepathy or some other psychic method to enter the future of a person?  If so, what happens to free will?  Are we really just puppets?  Is God around, or, do the perps control the future and the past now?  Does anyone else get this?

“infinite jest”…..

I just heard that the young writer David Foster Wallace committed suicide last night.  He was only 46, about my age.  Over a decade ago, he wrote a supernovel called Infinite Jest.  It is supposed to be about as far from Ayn Rand as you can get.  The only similar thing was the length.  I heard from other people on a blog he wrote the novel with footnotes and endless archaic words.  I laughed when I thought of the austere spiritual simplicity of Rand’s work.  Now I’m not laughing. 

From what I’ve been able to pick off the net, he had the big bulk of his career in the 1990s but was happy as a college professor in California.  He might have had a tendency towards depression.  His mother committed suicide.  Still it dosen’t explain it.  Guess what else was different about Mr. Wallace?  It’s probably the real reason he died.  Part of the answer is that he might have been targetted.

I doubt I will be able to get a library copy of his book now.  I checked out available copies at the local library system and 3 months or so ago there were only 2 in the entire system.  I guess his fame sort of came and went in the 1990s.  He was never an Oprah book selection.

This has floored me.  Is is me, or does it seem that a lot of very young talent is being taken very prematurely nowadays?

update:  9/26/08

I just read this in Salon Magazine.  Turns out he quit his “meds” the year before due to side effects but probably was unaware of the nasty rebound effects of quitting the pills after so many years.  The damn pills literally change your brain chemistry and when you quit them the symptoms that led you to take them in the first place, they return–worse.  He would have had to soldier out the bad symptoms until the shit was out of his system and gone to more natural alternatives to SSRI’s.  It seems his depression must have been very bad, indeed, though if he had quit all those months ago and the withdrawal had not slowed up.  He might have had to throw in the towel and gone back on them so his permanently drug altered brain could function correctly.

From what I’ve seen in myself, the SSRI’s, which I have been on since the 90s until recently, give you various physical and emotional side effects that lower your quality of life.  One is the lowering of sex drive, particularly painful in a male.  Another, is the blunting of emotions after being on them awhile.  You begin to feel like your just coasting thru life and nothing really makes you FEEL anything–a bad way to be for a novelist.  Another thing it did to me was blunt my imagination, which, in a novelist would be the end of their career.  It also seemed to slow my intelligence.  I felt slow and stupid after awhile.  Being on the drugs never slowed Wallace’s mind down, though.  Guess we’ll never know the real reason why he quit the drugs, but those are just my observations having been on about 4 different SSRI antidepressants over the years.

10/12

Update to the update:  just read this:

Turns out he not only tried to kick his SSRI’s but got run over by the psych community and ended up getting SHOCK THERAPY and was “heavily medicated” which probably reads antipsychotic drugs, which cause, at least for me, despondent depression.  Damn those spychiatrists.  I don’t think it was an accident either.  I wonder if the “doctor” who told him to quit SSRI’s cold turkey after 20 YEARS was in on it too.  Did Mr. Wallace start getting outspoken about government in recent months?

Ayn Rand’s style in the Fountainhead

Ayn Rand uses nature and how a man acts in nature.  She detest the man in the “social milieu”.  Roark looks at nature and sees what he can do with it in his buildings.  (Actually he looks at God’s work and tries to copy it, but at least he’s no copying MAN’S work).  He does his work for it’s own sake, not the adulation of men.  A self is self-powered not man powered.

Rand uses lots of nouns and very few adjectives.  Things (nouns) are entities in constant motion.  She uses nouns as verbs.  Her style is very masculine.  The essence of her reality is things.  She has no room for the supernatural.  She believes in no God, she does not write about dreams or have ghosts haunt her novels.  She limits herself to reality and must write beautifully in those limits.  Rand’s writing style is totally unique.  She does not borrow from the styles of others.

Roark is like an animal, in that he is not weakened by emotion.  He owns the world in his own eyes.  He is a self, not a serf.  He is no one’s slave, not even God’s.  He would bomb out as an adherent to any religion.  Man should exist for existence’s sake, not for others according to him. 

Rand uses weather in her novels to show the characters personality.  The sun is for her heroes, the rain is for her villians.  Roark holds what looks like a sun on the cover of the book. Wynand is would be a “storm” in her weather analogy.  Toohey is “damp” and “rain”.  Dominique represents “heat”, the “heat” or Roark.  Dominique could also be construed as “sky”.

The style of the Fountainhead is simple and direct and not full of deep symbolism.  There is no evidence of the supernatural.  Rand and her works were NOT widely accepted by her contemporaries nor is she now.  Her writing is not florid with rare words or weird plot devices.  It’s writing is very clear.  She writes for the common man and not scholars.  Her books do NOT need an English professor to translate.  People can come on their own to Rand and not have to enroll in their local college to decipher it’s meaning.

That’s all for the Fountainhead.  Next, I’d like to write on Atlas Shrugged which I think is even more important that the Fountainhead as it shows people like Toohey and his crew in action attempting to run society.  It has some alarming parallels to today’s society even though capitalism is still around.

the world did not end…shit!

So, you are stuck with me and my telling of Ellsworth Toohey’s eviiiil according to me and the nice professor at the ARI website…lions and tigers and tooheys…

Get me Howard Roark!!!!  I want his ass nao!!!!

….but I never think about you, Ellsworth

I.  Toohey is a bad boy

Toohey is (according to Bernstein) one of the nastiest villians in the history of literature.  He is considered a “worthy foe” of Roark, just like the devil and his little helpers the perps are “worthy foes” of mine.  Toohey is a larger than life villian but yet he is a parasite and needs a host to survive.  Perps need the misery and surveillance of their ti’s to survive or their lives are just empty shells.  Toohey and the perps are just like a virus.  Does a virus survive without a host?  Toohey ALSO needs others to be his parasites so he can run their lives.  He cripples people mentally and makes them dependent on him.  He is the early prototype of the cult leaders of the 1960s, 1970s and on.

When people lose their independence, they need a “leader” to fill their lives up with endless routines and rituals.  A perp leader demands total obedience and an underling perp gets to be a child again (I’m guessing here).  Toohey leads his weakend charges down a garden path to communism and fascism.  Strangely enough though, Toohey does not want to be the “fuhrer” but second or third in command when the takeover occurs as he wishes to be safely away from the violence.

As an “intellectual”, Toohey is probably more of a communist.  Nazism attracted the common people, wheras, communism attracted the “intellegentsia” of their time.  A communist dictator cannot use a Roark type person, whereas a fascist dictator may, if he played his cards right.  Rand was probably warning of an impending dictatorship in the US even though it was supposed to be harder to do it here than other places.

The tactics used are fear and psychological dependence.  These are used in Atlas Shrugged to create the communist type dictatorship that appears towards the end of the book.

Actually, Toohey is the WEAKEST person in the book.  He is a totally social animal and no individual.  He has no physical job skills to rely on.  He could not get a manual job if he had to.  He also has no passion, and no love and no way to feel deeply.  He cannot understand the relationship between Dominique and Roark as it develops since he cannot feel love.

 #2  TOOHEY, THE ULTIMATE VILLIAN

Ellsworth Toohey is a man full of power lust.  He uses terror against his victims and his would be followers that goes against reality but no one notices.  He keeps his power through his minions, or his well-known friends, all over the city in many professions.  He says to others that the only way to be in life is to be an altruist and that the only self worth a person can have is to sacrifice yourself to others.  He would prefer you would sacrifice yourself to him because he’s out to lunch and cannot find himself, so he will borrow you until HE gets back, if ever.

In the end Toohey must abandon reason.  It was never his friend anyhow and he never met God, either…so what is a Toohey to do?  He must conquer YOU and everyone else he meets or he’s dead meat.  He runs on schemes and plots and gossip to control others and get what he wants.  Just like the perps run lives all over this town and your town and every town on Earth now.  Toohey, like perps, has power over people, not nature.  (today’s controllers can control nature as well, but that was 1957 before most of the tech used against us today was invented).  Toohey has no control over his damaged body nor his damaged mind:  He only has power over people and weak people like Keating fall under his spell!

Toohey has neither physical nor real mental power to create a thing.  He is the guy who cannot sew on a button nor make TOAST.  (this could be said about many guys, however). 

“Toohey” types can control weak “selves” as well through intrigue and gossip destroying careers along the way.  This is what he does to Steve Mallory.  Toohey cannot destroy a true Roark.  Only a police state can do that.  Society is doing it now to its smartest and brightest.  If you target your brightest individuals with OS and EH, both of which are easily deniable, you can get rid of any intelligent person you want to.  IQ screening was common for school age children when I was a kid, is it still now?  We would all take these hokey standardized tests EVERY YEAR that seemed so stupid at the time as well..wonder if they were looking for people who were “too smart”, not seeing how the school was doing teaching the children.   In a police state, a man like Roark would be the first guy in the concentration camp.

In a dictatorial state, original thought is supressed and the only art that is available is repeats of what was done in the past in art, music, theater, film, fashion, etc…Can you see it happening now?  What is truly new out there now?  The news media is full of sensation but very little substance. If any person has an original idea and is not under direct control of the controllers the controllers will find a way to steal the idea even if it’s just a daydream of the person.  Mind reading is real today and can be done.  A ti’s thoughts come out on a screen just like someone was typing a letter.  Just don’t tell your family, friends, or the authorities your mind is being read because they’ve just been waiting for you to say that in order to lock you up and drug you to oblivion.

These parasites can get “free” ideas for songs, books, movies, TV shows and art to obtain “work” for the controlled puppets that work as entertainers in the system to release as their own.  Do you think that some of those dumbasses that are in entertainment today could order a f*cking extra value meal on their own?  I talked to a woman who SWORE her songs that she wrote were being stolen right out of her head.  I thought she was nuts:  now, I’m not so sure.  

The ultimate Tooheyism or vampirism is mind reading.  They also manage to take the energy and light of their victim making a ti tired and miserable most of the time since the perps have no light of their own.  The ti dies an early death unsung and unknown and the perp vampires who use the work (intellectual property known as thoughts and ideas) off the tis live and prosper well into their 90s and even 100s.  There is a certain class of entertainers/politicians that live a very long time and rarely get ill.  I read a post on a forum that said that these elites sucked off the misery of their victims to get a charge which then made them have more energy and longer lives.  I mean, why is Henry Kissinger still alive?  Sounds insane, but this world is insane.  Even “normal” people do this…why do you think there is so much negative press on certain celebrities today, and why do you think people gang up on people on these trashy talk shows like Jerry Springer and start chanting and cheering at someone they don’t like?  It’s the same thing on a smaller scale.   It happens to ti’s all the time when a perp is rude to a ti in public, gets a reaction, and then tells everyone at the scene that the ti is crazy and was mean to them, etc…then “everyone” at the scene is “against” the ti and seem to get a charge out of it.  I remember years ago at my old job when my co workers got me to tears how the WHOLE OFFICE seemed to have a charge to it…I had the feeling everyone was TOTALLY ENJOYING me being miserable.

Luckily for Roark, he does NOT live in today’s society and his ideas for buildings CANNOT be sucked out of his head NOR hacked out of his computer NOR can his conversations be listened to on his cell phone since he neither has a cell phone nor a computer.  Roark’s value quest and his fight against Toohey and his “peeps” controlls the plot of the story.  For some reason, Roark does not even suffer much with his setbacks.  No one calls Roark “poor Howard”.  Roark would just laugh at that one.  Henry Cameron suffers, though, and is much like contemporary ti’s in that the perps barbs do hurt.  Most men are not islands and will suffer when society rejects them.  How can we all be selves like Roark, not get hurt, and still operate in a society full of people?  I bet the perps would not want us to find out that one.

***I think I might be putting myself way out there with this post…the police kept on flying over with a helicopter, the neighbor kids are putting on a noise campaign, and the “neighbors” keep shouting threats from a backyard a few doors down.  Even passersby are being really “noisy” tonight, just shouting to themselves or into their cell phones.  Guess I hit a nerve.

Next time, Rand’s style of writing…

The end is here….

Maybe…someone in Europe is going to run the Big Bang Machine that might destroy us all!!!  I doubt it, but we would be 4 years ahead of the Dec 21, 2012 end of world schedule according to the Mayan calendar.  Guess I better put the rest of this post out since the WORLD IS ENDING TOMORROW after all.

The Fountainhead’s Meaning for Today and Why Roark is a Hero

When Ayn Rand wrote the Fountainhead in 1943, the characters lived in a free society and potential dictators only had so much power in the America of her book.  Free thinking individuals still could operate in that society despite hardships.  In 1957, when she wrote Atlas Shrugged, the Second Handers had taken over society, and the free thinking individuals (most of them businessmen) were disappearing.  It was still possible to be a free thinker even then but it could be punished and later on in the book, was.  In 2008, the controllers of society look at people to see if they have any free thinking traits and are put down in any number of ways (including OS/EH) so they are ineffective and viewed as insane.  I think (only my opinion) that children, for decades, have been tracked and filed with the government and any sign of true free thinking is investigated and if the child seems as if they might be a successful free thinker they are drugged out of their minds with psychiatric drugs and given to perps to stalk and harass.  Adults only have to run afoul of the wrong person in daily life to get this treatment as I wrote about in the Gloria Naylor post.  Where is she now?  She has written nothing since “1996″.  She is a nobody, a nothing since she became an OS/EH target, when she used to be famous, lauded by none less than Oprah Winfrey!

I think the Fountainhead was a warning about not letting the Second Handers get out of control or society will be free no longer.  Atlas Shrugged just continues that idea to it’s logical end, but without the scary technology and stalking gangs of today.  It’s only in a free country that evil people like Toohey are unable to stop the “Roarks” in society. 

The controllers MUST bring others down to their level to feel important.  A “Toohey” must bring a target down to destitution and misery to feel good since they are ONLY AS GOOD AS THEY ARE IN COMPARISON TO OTHERS AND CANNOT BE A SELF.  They are in a race against the whole human race for control of it.  They cannot see themselves and creations of God–wonderful and unique.  (Rand would disagree with the God part.)  Their “God”, if they are believers, demands total conformity to tons of rules and punishes them with impunity for breaking them.  Their “God” does not let them be themselves at all.  Second handers are either follow-the-leader types or seize power types.  They do not believe in their own power as human beings.  They cannot conceive of using power just to better life on Earth.  They must use power to control people like puppets.  See how Toohey likes to control his friends in the book.

The “selves” think to gain information from the world around them from their five senses while the controllers and conformists can only gain information from others and only use “what’s out there” to run the world.  The title of the book refers to Roark as the “Fountainhead” since he is the “font” of all his ideas on architecture and only needs his own mind to bring them to fruition.  The book is a love poem to all innovators and individualists everywhere.

The two projects that Roark ends up going to trial for are products of his mind, not tradition.  The first time Toohey arranges to attack him since the Stoddard Temple of the Human Spirit is seen as anti-God and there is a naked statue in front.  Toohey knew Roark was not a believer when he got old man Stoddard to hire Roark to create the temple.  It was a setup.  He loses the trial but still finds work. 

The second project Roark goes to trial over is the Cortland Homes, which was public housing.  Keating needs the project, and goes begging to Toohey for it and gets it.  Keating promptly goes to Roark for help even though he’s screwed him royally in the past.  Roark says he will design it but only with NO INPUT from anyone but himself.  Roark goes on vacation, and Toohey’s “dawgs” move in on Keating and totally screw up the building by ruining it architecturally.  Roark is enraged and destroys the building.  He faces time in prison.  This time Roark used the product of his own mind to create something for the public good and is punished.  The speech in his trial is famous when he describes how the individuals  are always punished for their contributions and only loved later.

Even today, schools are loath to assign Ayn Rand to students.  She is still attacked personally and called heartless.

Despite common thought, Rand would not consider herself a “conservative”.  Conservatives, to her, were traditionalists, who did things one way just because they were always done that way.  She believed everything must be made better and better as time went on as stagnation would lead us back to the caves in the end.

Rand also believed that being selfish was good, but not the kind of selfishness that people commonly believe to be selfishness.  A selfish person would love oneself enough to never compromise towards oneself and give up moral principles.  An example is when Roark gives up an assignment to build a huge building just because the Board of Directors want a “small” thing…a couple of columns in front of the building.  He could not do it and be true to himself so he turned it down much to his own detriment.  I think Christianity is like this when a person has to turn down something good in life just because it would go against the Word of God and cause (even a little) sin in their lives.

Selflessness in Rand’s world does not necessarily mean self-sacrifice except for the underlings in the Second hander’s world.  Selfless to Rand, means “no self” or no font of human intelligence to get a job done.  Keating, for example, does not go into a project, a job, or a relationship in order for it’s enjoyment or it’s mental stimulation but to manipulate people to get ahead in the “race” to the top of the crap heap.  The quality of the work done is irrelevent.  Keating will step on people to get ahead.  Keating literally kills Heyer to get to be Francon’s partner by scaring Heyer to death when Heyer was in a weak physical and mental state after a stroke.

Second handers “collect” people like others collect little objects such as glass unicorns.  Another writer, Taylor Caldwell, had a character in Let Love Come Last who collected ceramics be superficial and effeminate.  Reality to a second hand er is not objective reality but social reality, a world based on the opinions of others.  Keating tries to “collect” Roark when he gets Roark a job at Francon’s firm for awhile.  He tries to use him as an underling, a gofer.

The selflessness of Keating and Toohey represent a lack of self.  Roark is made of one material:  himself.  He cannot add another material to himself or he becomes a fraud.  Keating, Toohey, and the other second handers are mists that blow with the wind:  they coalesce in this shape and that, then disappear, only to reappear again when the time is convenient.  Roark is such a self, however, he does not even have a family.  His family are his friends who share his values.  A family would only entomb a “Roark”.  I see this as a shortcoming, but Rand did not place high value on biological family.

An ideal family, to Rand, should be able to nurture it’s members not MOLD their youngsters in “growing up”.  Children should be encouraged in moral values.  I disagree.  Children need some molding while very young.  Later, though, they should not be smothered but allowed to explore their dreams and pick goal to reach.

Roark’s values were in this order:  career, family (his friends), money, and last, recognition or what society thinks.  Society is on the bottom.  Roark would never surrender a higher value for a lower value on his scale or a non value such as fads or tradition.  He would not sell out.  Any selling out Roark would do would take years to rectify and Roark would never do it.

Roark’s virtue is his independence.  He uses his own judgement across all the areas of life.  He always adheres to rational values based in reality, not anyone’s fantasy.  Roark must not just think, but do.  He also does manual labor in his life.  Roark is the complete opposite of Hamlet who only thinks but does not do.  Roark puts his heroism into objective reality in the world of his buildings.  Roark would say “never ever give up your dreams”.

The Fountainhead is a moral declaration of independence according to one of Bernstein’s students.  It is a systematic demonstration of principle of independence:  a love letter to independence.  Rand preferred the American system of government because it was (in her time?) a republic, or a nation based on people’s individual rights.  She did not agree with democracies where the majority rule.  Taylor Calwell said in a Pillar of Iron that democracies degenerated into dictatorships.  Caldwell was a conservative similar to Rand but was an ardent believer in God.

Next time, if the world is still here, I will further examine how Bernstein reveals the villainy of Ellsworth Toohey and how the “Tooheys” of the world are so dangerous.

cast of characters

CAUTION, THIS CONTAINS SOME SPOILERS BUT NOT ENOUGH TO MAKE A CLIFF’S NOTES FOR A HIGH SCHOOLER.

The theme of the Fountianhead according to Ayn Rand is:  “Individualism vs. Collectivism NOT in politics but in men’s souls.”  The crux is that she uses the character and plot show how individualists and collectivists operate on a personal level in the world.  There is conflict between them that is not only carried throughout the Fountainhead but through all of Atlas Shrugged.  The individualists are far outnumbered by the collectivists, or second-hand people, as Roark calls them.  Then second-hand people can be further divided into “dictators”, or those who rule the second-handers, “conformists”, those who follow the “dictators”, and “rebels” who rebel against the dictators and conformists but add nothing of their own.  The “dictators” set the style in fashion, architecture, drama, philosophy, religion, etc…by mostly borrowing old ideas from the past and stealing new ones from the innovators and passing them off as their own.  The “conformists” wand to know what’s in style and how to blend in to succeed and to avoid sticking out too much. 

“Selves”, on the other hand, are innovaters.  They aspre to and create from their own private vision.  The vision could be anything as long as it’s totally new and not just an outgrowth or a reaction against the “dictators” of society.  The hiroes of the Fountainhead are the “selves” whose visions and innovations keep the human race going.  The dictators of style can only copy off them or most frequently, copy off the styles of the past.  The “style setters” work on the cycle:  they keep bringing back old fashions, stories, etc from the past to be in style again as if they are new with just a few changes.  The selves chuck all that mess and start from scratch.  The “selves” think out of the box because they were never in the box to begin with.

Each of the characters in the Fountainhead fall somewhere within or between these four categories.  Let us examine them.

 

 

#1  Howard Roark:  The Hero

He is the ultimate “self”.  Orphaned at an early age, he is forced to work since his teens.  He learns the building trades from an early age then follows his personal vision to attend college and become an architect.  Kicked out of college, he goes to work for his idol, the disgraced Henry Cameron.  Throughout the book, Roark faces challenge after challenge even nearly starving to death in a tenement apartment, but never giving up his personal vision nor his morals.  He is Rand’s prototype for a man and her ultimate hero until JOHN GALT comes along over a decade later.

#2  Peter Keating:  The Foil, a semi-villian

Peter is not really the villian of the novel, but he does go against the hero more than once.  He is the opposite of Roark in everything.  He is the prototype of the conformist.  Having lost his personal vision of being a painter and also the woman he loves to the pressure of his pushy mother, he can only live to please others and try to make money through connections to the wealthy architects of New York, all the while shamelessly taking advantage of Roark’s work.

#3 Henry Cameron

Henry Cameron, hero, bitter defeated self

He is the architectural genius of the past.  He is considered the inventor of skyscrapers.  He has had not had real work since 1893 and he is introduced in about 1922.  He is Roark’s mentor.  He does not compromise.  Cameron lost his career and now rents an office in the slums by the river.  He has a heart attack at work and Roark takes over his business for awhile until he is literally starved out of business in his early career.  He is considered a semi-developed “self” by Berkstein.  He is not considered a complete failure.  He is a very angry man and has been driven to drink.  He can operate as a “self”, but the rejection it causes hurts him emotionally.

#4  Guy Francon, semi villian, father of main heroine

Peter Keating’s famous boss.  The most important architect in New York.  Speaks at the commencement of Stanton where Peter meets him.  He is charming and sweet.  He has great people skills.  His fame rests on one building he did when he was young.  Now, he depends on his staff and his partner to come up with his great ideas.  He is an expert on clothing, food, wine, and parties.

#5  Dominique Francon, heroine, self

Guy Francon’s daughter hates people but has high ideals.  She is very similar to Dagny Taggart of Atlas shrugged.  She is considered to be Ayn Rand in a bad mood.  She is a typical female Rand character:  cold, remote, highly intelligent, sarcastic, hard working, thin frame, and more of a MAN than the male second handers of her novels.

#6  Ellsworth Toohey, villian, complete second hander

He is a leftist fascist.  Having had a inferiority complex since childhood, he is totally anti self.  He has a huge “posse” of hangers on that he advises and mentors.  He immedately hates Roark.  Toohey works with Dominique at the Banner newspaper owned by Gail Wynand.  Dominique conspires with Toohey against Roard at first.  Toohey hates Roark, but Dominique wants to snip Roark’s career in the bud to save Roark further hurt as she discovers she LOVES him.

#7  Gail Wynand, semi-hero, semi-self

Wynand is a Roark wanna-be.  He is the tough abrasive owner of the Banner newspaper. Toohey introduces Wynand to Dominique.  Wynand marries her leaving Peter alone.  Wynand also hires Roark to build his country home not knowing that Dominique and Roark are lovers.  (Rand has a similar love triangle in Atlas Shrugged between Dagny Taggart, Henry Rearden, and Francisco D’Anconia until John Galt blows that out of the water.)  Roark and Wynand become very close friends before the affair is found out.  Wynand and Roark have a “platonic love affair” that gets very close to a “real” one at times IMHO.  The scenes on Wynand’s yacht could be interpreted as borderline gay, but are not.  I think that Wynand is Henry Rearden in an unevolved form.

Minor Characters:

#8  Lois Cook, “rebel”, neither hero nor villian

She is the august author of the Gallant Gallstone.  She rebels agaist society without adding ideas of her own.  She writes strange books which are then praised by Toohey and his cultural posse as “art”.  She is like certain rock stars of this and past eras who are totally angry but have no vision of their own.  Berkstein brought up Sinead O’Connor and her tearing up a picture of the Pope as an example.  She hires Keating to build her the ugliest house possible in the worst neighborhood in New York, the Bowery.  Her famous quote is “let’s be ugly”…maybe it’s a good name for a blog.

#9  Dean of Stanton, conformist, neither villian nor hero

Likes Roark, but cannot retain him in his school because Roark won’t give up his principles.  The Dean is the first person Roark has to stand up to in the Fountainhead.

#10  Mrs. Keating, conformist, villian?

Crushes Peter’s dreams then tries to rebuild him to be what she sees as a success.  Peter and Mrs. Keating end up clinging to each other in the end.

#11  Louis Heyer, conformist, neither hero nor villian

Francon’s partner that Keating hustles out of a job and later virtually kills later on by frightening him to death.  One of Keating’s sly coup de etats to get ahead.

#12  Catherine, rebel????, neither villian nor hero

Keating’s love. Artless and unsophisticated, the status oriented Peter still loves Catherine.  She is Toohey’s neice.  Peter rejects her for Dominique due to pressure from his mother and cannot get Catherine back in later years.  She becomes a bitter harsh social worker.  (Rand has a hatred for social workers:  see also the “Cheryl” suicide scene in Atlas Shrugged). 

#13  Mike Donagan, hero, self

Construction worker who befriends Roark.  Is not an innovator but takes pride in a job well done and no crap from others.  He is not smart enough to be a “college boy” but is a great electrician.

#14  Steve Mallory, hero, failed self

Sculptor forced to take demeaning work in ceramics just to get by.  Roark recognizes his brilliance just in time.  Is near starvation when Roark actually tracks him down to his apartment to give him a job.  He is the man who attempts to kill Toohey but gets off at trial when Toohey plays the whole thing down.  His career is ruined and he chases women and drinks.  He is literally resurrected by Roark.  Roark supports him then gives him work until Mallory’s own assignments start coming in.  The very emotional scene with Roark in his apartment parallels the tragic death scene in Atlas Shrugged with Rearden’s assistant, Tony, the “wet nurse” assigned to him by the government.  This scene ends much less tragically, though.

These are some of the characters in the Fountainhead.  There are others, but I omitted them due to time and space.  Some other characters of note however are Enright and Heller, who give Roark a chance in architecture.

Roark and Roll…Rand’s Perfect Man…before Galt, that is…

Ayn Rand published the Fountainhead in 1943 about a dozen years after she came to America.  With English being her second language, she created a new American Sweetheart:  Howard Roark, America’s Best Architect.  With this character she wanted to create a new person, not one based on the lives of other people.  She created a self contained person who could withstand any storm.  She considered him to be a prototype of the ideal American.  She hoped to wake up America and the world to stand up to the invasion of the second handers or the “modern” man of today who cannot think or act for himself and only cares to live for and through others.  In this book she illustrates the life of one of her heroes against the backdrop of a still-free America and the challenges he faces.  In Atlas Shrugged she presents pretty much the same type of heroes in an America that is fast becoming a communist dictatorship and how they must cope.  In that light, the Fountainhead is part I in a two-book series with Atlas Shrugged.

Most of my material for the Fountainhead post comes from a six part lecture by Andrew Bernstein who has his course posted on the Ayn Rand Institute website.  I was so taken by the character of Roark from the get-go I felt a need to blog on this, and also Atlas Shrugged.  There are really no characters like Rand’s in any other book.  Rand herself said that her books were totally original and that her plots and her characters were totally original. (From Preface to Atlas Shrugged 1991 edition).  I believe it.  You must read these books and you will believe too.

Ayn Rand wasn’t perfect.  She presents the ideal man but has no idea how a society of these kind of perfect people would exist in reality.  In her two main novels she never has her heroes

  1. Have children and try to raise them this way
  2. Any religious faith of any kind
  3. Have any type of physical or mental disease to challenge them
  4. Have positive relations with their biological families
  5. Even have pets

Her heroes/heroines are also always perfectly thin and beautifully clasically dressed.  They don’t seem to crave lots of food or drink or anything but sex, and only with other perfect people!  You will note in each book that the female lead has no less than three lovers and a decent sexual appetite for the times.  (The sex scenes are a nice surprise for people expecting to be bored by Rand.)

Rand did not see humanity, with it’s warts, worth saving at all, only her perfect people and their admirers more or less.  How were people who didn’t meet her exacting standards supposed to survive after her perfect America was in place?  Guess I’d have to ask my mother which would be much harder than you’d think. The time Rand’s characters enjoy themselves is very rare, indeed.  I can think of only one real example.  It’s when Howard Roark goes on the yacht of Gail Wynand towards the end of the Fountainhead.  He totally lets himself go and enjoy his vacation to the point it shocks Wynand.  Thank God (even though Rand did not believe) for that.  Still, I believe she has many many points to make and much to say about society today and how we (they, LOL) have gone wrong.  Here is Mr. Howard Roark, Ayn Rand’s fire haired sex symbol.

In the beginning, we see Howard Roark standing on the edge of a cliff, nude, and mighty proud of himself that he quit school.  He could not continue in school because the dean and the professors want him to conform to the old ideas of architecture.  It is supposed to be 1921.  Roark is only twenty or so.  This first challenge he faces becomes a lifetime of challenges for Roark, but for the time being, he stands on the cliff, ready to dive into a natural pool, a mini-God.  We are led to know he has enormously high self esteem and is physically desirable.  He is tall, thin (almost too thin), has bright red hair, gray eyes and high cheekbones.  He is an almost instant turn on for female readers.

Roark is an independent and the source of his ideas is himself and the objective reality (the five senses) around him.  He refuses to borrow ideas from the past for his buildings and also refuses the help of other’s to “pull him up”.  When he gets help from others he makes sure it’s an equal trade and he will give at least as much as he gets.  He is always thinking of architecture day and night.  He can look at rocks or a wall or a cliff and complete a building in his head.  His mind never stops.

He has few friends and no family.  Throughout the novel he keeps it that way.  The few friends he makes accept him the way he is and do not try and change or manipulate him in any way.  He wants relationships of mutual respect.  He never wants to be in a one-up, one-down relationship.  When he finds love it is only with the most impossibe woman in New York and through nothing he can buy her–all he can offer is himself.

Roark takes rejection in stride because he never lets the hurt go too deep.  The only hurt he feels is that his work is affected and he can’t continue.  He won’t mope or sit and pine away because someone does not like him.  When asked by Ellsworth Toohey what Roark thinks of him after Toohey screws him out of a contract, Roark says “I don’t think of you.” and he means it.  Later, Rand had more feeling heroes in Atlas Shrugged, but her perfect man with the fire hair could take all the crap life gave him in stride without developing mental problems or substance problems or even stress!

For Rand, maybe Roark was what she dreamed of being:  someone who did not emotionally react to their accusers.  Maybe Roark was a dream to Rand.  It was obvious she was sensitive in real life, as her interview on Donahue way back in 1980 shows.  When an audience member took her on about some of her views, Rand could not argue calmly but resorted to nasty anger.  I expected her to be calm and react like Roark would but she was all too human after all.

In the next post, I will examine Roark’s relationship to the other characters in the book and what the book means to people today.

Please look here to see another view on who Rand’s favorite character might be.

Also, there might be a movie on Atlas Shrugged with Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt.  Jolie and Dagny, Pitt as Galt? and someone said GEORGE as Francisco.

Selfhood

 

To be or not to be: to embrace indiduality or to become a walking corpse.  That is the question.  In 2008, we are anybody or everybody, but are we, are you, yourself?  Is this the real reason society is dying and the stalkers have their way?  Everything is permissible now, except to be oneself.  That is the central theme of Ayn Rand’s two major books, The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged.

Today is September 2.  It is a day that is constantly played a part in the plot of Atlas Shrugged.  What a good day to write about Ayn Rand.

Ayn Rand was one of the most influential writers of the 20th century.  Born in Russia, she came to the US in her twenties and began to write her brilliant novels after learning English as a second language.  She wrote 4 novels, a play, and many books on philosophy.  She was the “it” girl of “intelligent” people in the 1960s.  She had a cult following.  She looked like a dominatrix, had far right politics and was an atheist.  Oh, I hate her already…I love her too.  Mainly hate, but totally love, too.  Am I making sense?

Oh, Ayn Rand, had you never lived!  You opened up a river of knowledge I rather have left closed!  All my beliefs and assumptions have been shaken up.  Why did I wait so late to read your works?  My mother.  She was all agog over you and your works.  We didn’t get along.  She was conservative, I was liberal.  I loved heavy metal and if it wasn’t performed with an orchestra it wasn’t music to her!

She was elegant, my clothes would fit in at a trailer park.  She spoke the Queen’s English, I spoke like a truck driver.  I believe in God, she didn’t.  On that last point I will never change, but on many other principles I hold dear my world has been shaken up.

I have already been woken up these past few years by learning how the world really operates at the global level via the internet, and I have seen the horrible sad truth of how the world operates at the street level by experiencing OS/EH myself and hearing from other targets.  Still, I was child of the society I was born into.  The things I liked and disliked, my political views, and my personal preferences in all things have been shaped by late twentieth century/ early twenty-first century society.  I have never had a chance to become myself–a self, an individual.

All the things we do to appear as a “rebel” or an individual are actually preprogrammed socially acceptable ways to express “anger” at society without really changing anything.  Man, of all animals, has the potential to be an individual, but, instead always chooses one of two alternatives in most situations:  either they conform or they rebel against the conformist.  True individuals who are self inspired OR God inspired are very rare.  Most individuality has been beaten out of us by puberty.  First, the family socializes us into our societal roles, then, our peer groups, co-workers, governments, and religious leaders do the rest of the  work to turn us into a tiny part of an organism called “society”.  The few who hold onto individuality after childhood, suffer greatly.  A tiny minority of individuals rise above it all–these are Ayn Rand’s heroes.

Here, we have Howard Roark, and Dominique Francon of the Fountainhead and Dagny Taggart, Henry Rearden, and John Galt of Atlas Shrugged.  Rand created these characters as prototypes to illustrate her philosophy of Individualism and to create a map for people to follow in order to revive American society and avoid dictatorship.  We have ignored her.  In 2008, we are closer to dictatorship than ever.

Let us study the characters to see what we can learn in order to become ourselves.  To be a “self” one must first become an “I”.  In an earlier book Rand shows a society where everyone refers to themselves as “we” and all activities are collective.  There is no sense of a self or an “I”.  One character in the book discovers that he is an “I” and the book goes from there.  To be aware of oneself as a seperate entitiy is the first step towards selfhood ir individualism.  After that, one must accomplish or produce something of real value using the person inside, not society, to decide what that is.  Maybe another name for “society” is in order.  Any ideas?  How about the meat grinder?  We can all be hamburgers, not steaks, and no one stands out.  Then, the “second handers” can gobble us all up to feed their unlimited appetites.

Rand places emphasis on deifying productivity and not spiritual growth as the way to advance selfhood.  In her books only the dollar sign is God.  America is the land of self made businessmen, which it WAS at one point.  She starts by illustrating how to be an individual vs. one of the herd, but falls down by only letting the reader (and herself) experience material prosperity and endless days at the office as the joy in life. 

My belief in God is a sign of weakness, especially exemplified in John Galt’s Neverending Speech near the end of Atlas Shrugged.  The way John Galt rips “mystics” a new rear end in the Speech is scary.  He makes all leaders in religion out to be scared, twisted, delusional monsters.  “Joy” in Rand’s world also consists of having a huge ego, a hard skinny body (all her lead charcters are very thin), and purrfect health.  Qualities such as humility and self sacrifice are seen as phony and delusional in Galt’s Speech.  Anyone who exhibits these qualities without an apparent selfish motive is living a life of death according to Rand.

There are many shortcomings in Rand’s philosophy but I think she did a lot to put the perp/hive mindset in a bad light and to celebrate the individual.  Like ti’s, her characters suffer much persecution and alienation while living up to their principles. In her books, they mostly overcome and triumph in the end, unlike ti’s.  A ti is forced into a life of endless defeat by the endless stalking/mind control and life sabatoge of the loser freaks.  In Rand’s novel, the villians only go so far and aren’t allowed unlimited access to their victim, so the victim has a chance to shore up and regroup his thoughts.  I would like to show how modern society and it’s leaders foster ignorance and stupidity in order to create to the perfect perp controlled culture.

Next time, Howard Roark, the individual, against the world…